1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 37 Cal.App.4th
  5. 37 Cal.App.4th 1495 (1995)
 

STANCHFIELD v. HAMER TOYOTA, INC.

Docket No. B082481.

37 Cal.App.4th 1495 (1995)

44 Cal. Rptr. 565

PHILIP STANCHFIELD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HAMER TOYOTA, INC., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

August 25, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Meisenheimer & Herron, Matthew V. Herron and Robert M. Steele for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lowthorp, Richards, McMillan, Miller, Conway & Templeman, Alan R. Templeman and John Q. Masteller for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BRANDLIN, J.*

On August 5, 1991, plaintiff Philip Stanchfield filed suit against Hamer Toyota, Inc., and other defendants (referred to collectively as Hamer Toyota) seeking damages for breach of an employment agreement and specific performance of a stock purchase agreement. His complaint also included other causes of action which are not pertinent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases