DIAZ v. UNITED AGR. EMPLOYEE WELF. BENEFIT PLAN

No. 93-56092.

50 F.3d 1478 (1995)

Mario DIAZ; Maria Diaz, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN AND TRUST; Associated Citrus Packers Employee Benefit Plan, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 27, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sharon J. Arkin, Shernoff, Bidart & Darras, Claremont, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Ronald J. Cooke, Littler, Mendelson, Fastiff, Tichy & Mathiason, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee United Agr.

Donald D. Wilson and Lisa M. Kralik, Grace, Skocypec, Cosgrove & Schirm, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee Associated Citrus.

Before: BRUNETTI and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges, and SHADUR, Senior District Judge.


SHADUR, Senior District Judge.

Mario Diaz ("Mario") and his wife Maria (collectively "Diazes") sue United Agricultural Employee Welfare Benefit Plan and Trust (the "Plan") and Associated Citrus Packers ("Associated") for medical benefits assertedly owed to Diazes under the Plan, an employee welfare benefit plan subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1461, and to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases