LLOYD v. CITY OF ST. PAUL

No. CX-95-1080.

538 N.W.2d 921 (1995)

Thomas A. LLOYD and Carol M. Neumann, Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. PAUL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied December 20, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Willard L. Wentzel, Jr., Wilbur W. Fluegel, Wentzel & Fluegel, Minneapolis, for Appellants.

Timothy E. Marx, City Attorney, Lisa L. Veith, Assistant City Attorney, St. Paul, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and RANDALL and NORTON, JJ.


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellants challenge the district court's reliance on Minn.Stat. § 466.03, subd. 6e (1994) (recreational services immunity), as a basis for dismissing tort claims and awarding summary judgment to the City of St. Paul. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellants Thomas Lloyd and his wife were seated with their niece in a paddle boat at the Como Lake paddle boat concession in St. Paul when the chief supervisor at the concession...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases