HOOVER v. PIERCE COUNTY

No. 16954-1-II.

903 P.2d 464 (1995)

79 Wash.App. 427

Galen A. HOOVER and Patricia L. Hoover, husband and wife, Respondents, v. PIERCE COUNTY, a municipal corporation, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

Reconsideration Denied November 3, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald La Mar Williams, Pierce County Deputy Pros Atty, Tacoma, WA, for Appellant.

Joseph F. Quinn, Vandeberg Johnson & Gandara, Tacoma, WA, Harold T. Hartinger, Vandeberg Johnson & Gandara, Tacoma, WA, for Respondents.


FLEISHER, Judge.

The Hoovers instituted an inverse condemnation action against Pierce County, claiming that a county roadway diverted surface waters onto the Hoovers' property. The trial court ordered a directed verdict against the County, and the jury determined damages. The County appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in granting a directed verdict for the Hoovers, and in denying its motion for a directed verdict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases