PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASS'N v. FLRA

No. 93-1676.

47 F.3d 1217 (1995)

PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 28, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph V. Kaplan, Silver Spring, MD, argued the cause and filed the briefs, for petitioner.

William E. Persina, Atty., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on the brief were, David M. Smith, Solicitor, Arthur A. Horowitz, Associate Solicitor, and James F. Blandford, Atty., Federal Labor Relations Authority, Washington, DC. Pamela Penny Johnson, Washington, DC, entered an appearance, for respondent.

Before BUCKLEY, GINSBURG, and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.

GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

The Patent Office Professional Association (a union) petitions for review of an order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority declaring non-negotiable certain bargaining proposals that it submitted to the Patent and Trademark Office. Because the Authority properly determined that the Union's proposals were neither negotiable "procedures" nor "appropriate arrangements" under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases