O'HARA & CROUGH v. GREENSTEIN


213 A.D.2d 1004 (1995)

624 N.Y.S.2d 330

O'Hara & Crough, Appellant, v. Gerald Greenstein, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

March 17, 1995


Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum:

Supreme Court erred in dismissing the complaint based on lack of personal jurisdiction. The court determined that "nail and mail" service pursuant to CPLR 308 (4) was improper because the attempts by plaintiff's process server to serve defendant personally did not constitute "due diligence." The court found, after a traverse hearing, that the process...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases