The record supports Supreme Court's dismissal of the petition. Petitioner's contention that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial could have been raised on direct appeal or in a motion pursuant to CPL article 440. In fact, the issue was the subject of at least one such motion, which was denied. In addition, as Supreme Court noted, this is not a case involving the deprivation of a substantial constitutional right on the face of the record so as to warrant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
