RUCH v. IDEAL CLEANERS & LAUNDRY

No. 94-395.

653 So.2d 509 (1995)

Betty RUCH, Appellant, v. IDEAL CLEANERS & LAUNDRY and Aetna Life & Casualty Company, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

April 25, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Vaughan, Orlando, and Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Longwood, for appellant.

Daniel DeCiccio and Roland P. Tan of DeCiccio & Associates, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

The judge of compensation claims's order denying Betty Ruch's claim for permanent total disability benefits is affirmed. This affirmance, however, does not preclude Mrs. Ruch from applying for and receiving rehabilitation and retraining under section 440.49, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1990), if such retraining is found to be appropriate by the judge of compensation claims.

AFFIRMED.

ZEHMER, C.J., BARFIELD, J., and SHIVERS, Senior...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases