ETHYL CORP. v. E.P.A.

No. 94-1505.

51 F.3d 1053 (1995)

ETHYL CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, et al., Respondents. American Automobile Manufacturers Association, Ferroalloys Association, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided April 14, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. William Brownell argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Kevin L. Fast.

Jon M. Lipschultz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, argued the cause, for respondents. With him on the brief were Lois J. Schiffer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, and Timothy D. Backstrom, Atty., E.P.A.

V. Mark Slywynsky argued the cause and filed the brief, for intervenor American Auto. Mfrs. Ass'n.

Mark Brian Benedict filed the brief, for intervenor Ferroalloys Ass'n.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, WALD and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge EDWARDS.

HARRY T. EDWARDS, Chief Judge:

At issue in this case is a claim that the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA" or "Agency") has impermissibly construed a provision of the Clean Air Act ("Act") governing the regulation of fuel additives. Title II of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7521-7590 (1988 & Supp. V 1993), establishes a comprehensive scheme for regulating motor vehicle emission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases