In August 1993, respondent State Board for Professional Medical Conduct (hereinafter the Board) charged petitioner with 15 specifications of professional misconduct, including charges of sexual abuse and harassment, fraudulent practice and moral unfitness; the charges stem from examinations he conducted of five patients during 1991 and 1992. A hearing was held before a Hearing Committee of the Board (hereinafter the Committee), which...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.