1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 657 So.2d
  5. 657 So.2d 363 (1995)
 

SZODOMKA v. LAMBERT

No. 94-CA-979.

657 So.2d 363 (1995)

Ida SZODOMKA v. Hugh P. LAMBERT and Lambert & Nelson, a Professional Law Corporation.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Dutel, Richard R. Schulze, Patricia G. Young, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant Ida Szodomka.

Laurence D. Rudman, Kiefer & Rudman, a Professional Law Corp., Metairie, for defendant-appellee Lambert & Nelson, a Professional Law Corp.

Before KLIEBERT, DUFRESNE and CANNELLA, JJ.

KLIEBERT, Chief Judge.

This dispute concerns the propriety of an attorney's contracted fee based on a contingency fee contract in a domestic matter. Plaintiff, Ida Szodomka, sued her former attorney, defendants Hugh Lambert and Lambert & Nelson, PLC, to rescind the contingency fee contract executed by the parties. Defendants moved for summary judgment and the trial court, finding the doctrine of equitable estoppel was applicable, granted summary judgment and dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases