1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 877 P.2d
  5. 877 P.2d 116 (1994)
 

CITIZENS' UTIL. BD. v. PUBLIC UTIL. COM'N

9111-07171; CA A78100.

877 P.2d 116 (1994)

128 Or. App. 650

CITIZENS' UTILITY BOARD OF OREGON, Respondent, v. OREGON PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Appellant, and U.S. West Communications, Inc., Defendant-Intervenor-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 29, 1994.

Review Denied October 18, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Keith L. Kutler, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen.

J. Rion Bourgeois, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Mary Burns Tomlinson, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for intervenor-appellant.

Before ROSSMAN, P.J., and De MUNIZ and LEESON, JJ.

ROSSMAN, Presiding Judge.

The question in this case is whether, when it issued its Order No. 91-1140 establishing extended area telephone service (EAS)1 for the Portland metropolitan area, the Public Utility Commission (PUC) committed reversible error. The Citizens' Utility Board (CUB) has taken issue with an interlocutory ruling of PUC, Order No. 91-958, protecting from public disclosure certain documents said to contain confidential...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases