Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that he was denied his right to the effective assistance of counsel because of his trial attorney's "failure to explore the suggestiveness" of a police officer's prior out-of-court photographic identification of the defendant. We agree with the People that the photographic identification procedure referred to by the defendant was purely confirmatory, and that the notice and hearing requirements relating to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
