LERMAN v. RUSSELL


207 A.D.2d 746 (1994)

616 N.Y.S.2d 961

Bernard Lerman, Respondent, v. Harold Russell et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 29, 1994


Arbitration is the proper form of resolution for the issues being litigated here between plaintiff Lerman and defendant Russell since said issues are pertinent to the validity and effect of the share purchase agreement and its effect upon the original shareholders agreement, which contains a broad arbitration clause (see, Matter of Fener Realty Co. [NICO Constr. Co.], 182 A.D.2d 436).

However, since KRL did not sign...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases