Defendant's claim that the trial court should have instructed the jury on the defense of intoxication is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, defendant never having requested such an instruction, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. If we were to review it, we would find that the evidence was insufficient to cause a reasonable person to entertain doubt whether defendant was so intoxicated as to be unable to form the specific intent to rob...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
