Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The court's ruling that there was an independent source for the complainant's in-court identification of the appellant as his attacker was amply supported by the testimony adduced during the first part of the Wade hearing. During his initial testimony the complainant testified to his ability to closely observe and describe his attacker independently of an allegedly suggestive...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.