TOTO v. FORD


208 A.D.2d 712 (1994)

618 N.Y.S.2d 546

Mary A. Toto, Appellant, v. Eugene R. Ford, Jr., Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 17, 1994


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant submitted proof in admissible form which established that the plaintiff had not suffered a "serious injury" within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). The burden thus shifted to the plaintiff to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see, e.g., Pagano v Kingsbury, 182 A.D.2d 268). Upon our review of the record, we conclude that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases