The hospital records and credited testimony of petitioners' psychiatrist regarding the manifestations of respondent's mental illness and his repeated confinements and incarcerations provided clear and convincing evidence that respondent is mentally ill within the meaning of Social Services Law § 384-b (6) (a). The expert testimony on behalf of both respondent and petitioners agreed that respondent has a chronic undifferentiated form of schizophrenia or a schizoaffective...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.