Family Court properly denied appellant's motion for a Wade hearing on the ground that suggestiveness was not a concern because the victim and appellant were known to one another (see, People v Gissendanner,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.