Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
After considering the extent of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the nature of the underlying charge, whether or not there was an extended period of pretrial incarceration, and whether the delay actually prejudiced the defendant, we agree with the Supreme Court's determination that the delay between the defendant's arrest and his motion to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.20 did not deprive him of his constitutional...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
