1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 183 Wis.2d
  5. 183 Wis.2d 683 (1994)
 

STATE v. SEYMOUR

No. 91-2962-CR.

183 Wis.2d 683 (1994)

515 N.W.2d 874

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent-Petitioner, v. Douglas SEYMOUR, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided May 25, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant there was a brief by John M. Brinckman and John M. Brinckman & Associates, LaCrosse and oral argument by John M. Brinckman.

For the plaintiff-respondent-petitioner the cause was argued by Mary Burke, assistant attorney general, with whom on the briefs were Marguerite M. Moeller, assistant attorney general and James E. Doyle, attorney general.

JANINE P. GESKE, J.

This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals, State v. Seymour, 177 Wis.2d 305, 502 N.W.2d 591 (Ct. App. 1993), which reversed a judgment of the circuit court for La Crosse county, Peter G. Pappas, Circuit Judge. A majority of the court of appeals (Dykman, J., dissenting) concluded that sec. 943.20(1)(b), Stats., should not be construed differently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases