1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 273 N.J.
  5. 273 N.J. Super. 552 (1994)
 

HARMON v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA

273 N.J. Super. 552 (1994)

642 A.2d 1042

JOHN W. HARMON, RONALD M. GARGANO, AND MICHAEL FILLER, JR., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 3, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Neil Mullin argued the cause for appellant (Smith, Mullin, P.C.; Nancy Erika Smith, of counsel; Walter Lucas, on the brief).

Margaret M. Madden argued the cause for respondent (Grotta, Glassman & Hoffman, P.A.; Ms. Madden and Mark J. Potel on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, LONG and LANDAU.

The opinion of the court was delivered by SHEBELL, P.J.A.D.

This appeal involves a discovery issue which arises out of an age discrimination suit brought by plaintiffs, John Harmon, Ronald Gargano, and Michael Filler against defendant, The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company (A & P). The complaint alleges that plaintiffs' employment with defendant was terminated in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -42...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases