SCHUMER v. LEVINE


208 A.D.2d 605 (1994)

618 N.Y.S.2d 225

Jeffrey Schumer, Appellant, v. Seymour Levine et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 11, 1994


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff's motion must be considered a motion to reargue rather than to renew, because he presented no new facts which were not presented in opposition to the original motion (see, Caffee v Arnold, 104 A.D.2d 352). No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, DeFreitas v Board of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases