1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 70 Ohio
  5. 70 Ohio St.3d 6 (1994)
 

LIDDELL v. SCA SERV. OF OHIO, INC.

No. 93-294.

70 Ohio St.3d 6 (1994)

LIDDELL, APPELLANT, v. SCA SERVICES OF OHIO, INC., APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 3, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sindell, Lowe & Guidubaldi and Ryan H. Fisher, for appellant.

Gallagher, Sharp, Fulton & Norman, Alan M. Petrov and Timothy J. Fitzgerald, for appellee.

Arter & Hodden and Irene C. Keyse-Walker, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys.

Altman & Calardo Co., L.P.A., and D. David Altman, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

WRIGHT, J.

The issue presented to us today is whether a rule of discovery can be applied to toll the statute of limitations for a cause of action alleging negligent exposure to toxic chlorine gas, where the plaintiff subsequently develops a cancerous growth allegedly caused by the exposure, and where the cancer could not be, and was not, discovered until after the applicable statute of limitations governing causes of action for bodily injury had expired. In this case...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases