Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his in limine motion, made at the Wade hearing, to preclude the People from cross-examining him as to his meeting with the police immediately prior to being placed in the line-up at which he was identified by the complainant (see generally, People v Schwartzman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
