SHERMAN v. ANSELL


207 A.D.2d 537 (1994)

616 N.Y.S.2d 90

Barbara Sherman, Respondent, v. Alan P. Ansell et al., Defendants, and Diane C. Carroll, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Joseph A. Milligan, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

August 29, 1994


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Because the issue of whether an attorney's conduct constitutes legal malpractice normally requires that factual determinations be made by a jury based upon expert testimony (see, Drab v Baum, 114 A.D.2d 992), the defendant third-party plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was properly denied.

There is no merit to the appellant's claim...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases