Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellants maintain that it was error for the Supreme Court to deny them relief on the ground that they failed to sustain their burden of proof. In the appellants' view, their original offer of proof, which had been timely served and filed, was in compliance with the court's Rules for the Special Election Part. They further contend that, in any event, it was error to reject their supplemental...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
