Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the claimant established that the use of the speed bump as a traffic control device created an unreasonably dangerous condition in the roadway and was a proximate cause of the claimant's injuries. Therefore the court properly determined that the defendant was partially at fault in the happening of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.