Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Given the plaintiffs' own delay in prosecuting the main action, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion for a severance of the third party action on the grounds that delay in its prosecution would prejudice the plaintiffs (see, CPLR 1010). In addition, since the Supreme Court has indicated that it intends to insure that prosecution of the third...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.