Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the identity of the perpetrator was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt. In support thereof, the defendant relies upon the divergence between the complainant's description of the assailant and the defendant's actual physical characteristics. However, we find that, viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.