U.S. EX REL. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RY. v. QUINN

No. 92-7157.

14 F.3d 645 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. SPRINGFIELD TERMINAL RAILWAY COMPANY; David A. Fink, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Francis X. QUINN, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided February 8, 1994.

Suggestion for Rehearing Denied April 8, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Catherine R. Connors, Portland, ME, argued the cause, for plaintiffs-appellants. With her on the briefs was Charles S. Einsiedler, Jr., Portland, ME.

Thomas P. Barletta, Washington, DC, argued the cause, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Mary Jean Anderson, Washington, DC. Jerald S. Howe, Jr., Washington, DC, entered an appearance.

Before WALD, GINSBURG and RANDOLPH, Circuit Judges.


Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Denied April 8, 1994.*

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WALD.

WALD, Circuit Judge:

This case presents issues of first impression concerning the 1986 amendments to the qui tam1 provisions of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq. ("FCA"). Under these provisions, private persons acting on behalf of the government may sue those...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases