1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 70 Ohio
  5. 70 Ohio St.3d 570 (1994)
 

STATE EX REL. CARVER v. HULL

No. 93-1514.

70 Ohio St.3d 570 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. CARVER, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. HULL, SHERIFF, ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 19, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller, Dye, Huddleston & Knapp and C. Lawrence Huddleston, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Lynn Alan Grimshaw, Scioto County Prosecuting Attorney, and William K. Shaw, Jr., Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Per Curiam.

This cause presents six questions for our review. First, should the motion to strike and for dismissal be granted? Second, does Carver have standing to maintain this action? Third, does Hull owe Carver reinstatement, or did SPBR abuse its discretion in finding a violation of Carver's recall rights? Fourth, does Carver have an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law? Fifth, should mandamus be denied due to laches? Sixth, did the court of appeals...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases