SABO v. SCHOTT

No. 94-909.

70 Ohio St.3d 527 (1994)

SABO, APPELLANT, v. SCHOTT ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided October 12, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Katz, Greenberger & Norton and Stephen A. Imm, for appellant.

Martin, Bailey & MacDonald and Stephen A. Bailey, for appellees.


The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. Plaintiff's allegation that he was fired as a result of having testified truthfully, albeit unfavorably to the defendants, if proven to be true, would constitute conduct on the part of the defendants which violates the public policy of this state. This cause is remanded to the trial court to apply Painter v. Graley (1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 377, 639 N.E.2d 51.

MOYER, C...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases