BARON v. STEWART MICHAEL DESIGN, INC.


202 A.D.2d 383 (1994)

608 N.Y.S.2d 516

Stephen Baron et al., Respondents, v. Stewart Michael Design, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

March 7, 1994


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the parties are directed to proceed to arbitration.

The parties entered into a contract which contained an arbitration clause. After the defendant gave notice of its intent to terminate the contract and seek arbitration, the plaintiffs commenced this action, seeking damages for breach of contract, fraud, conversion, and negligence. The record, which the parties stipulate is complete, is bare of pleadings or motion papers demonstrating that the plaintiffs sought rescission. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court should have directed the parties to proceed to arbitration (see, Matter of Bichler v 100 Lexington Ave. Corp., 4 A.D.2d 949).


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases