1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 203 A.D.2d
  5. 203 A.D.2d 336 (1994)
 

MANZELLA v. GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO.

203 A.D.2d 336 (1994)

612 N.Y.S.2d 918

Joseph Manzella et al., Appellants, v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 11, 1994

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs' contention that the court erred in giving the missing witness charge in question is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPLR 4110-b, 5501 [a] [3]), and we find no basis to consider it in the exercise of our...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases