STATE EX REL. CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR MORE PROFESSIONAL GOVT. v. CITY OF ZANESVILLE CITY COUNCIL

No. 94-1720.

70 Ohio St.3d 455 (1994)

THE STATE EX REL. CONCERNED CITIZENS FOR MORE PROFESSIONAL GOVERNMENT v. CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ZANESVILLE ET AL.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 31, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Graham & Graham, Stubbins, Lewis, Watson & Erhard Co., L.P.A., and Brent A. Stubbins, for relator.

Thomas R. Bopeley, Zanesville Director of Law, for respondents.


Per Curiam.

In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, relator must establish that (1) it has a clear legal right to have the proposed charter issue placed on the November 8, 1994 ballot, (2) respondents have a corresponding legal duty to submit the ordinance concerning the charter issue by placing it on the November 8, 1994 ballot, and (3) relator possesses no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Seikbert v. Wilkinson

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases