LOVELADY v. BRYSON ESCROW, INC.

Docket No. B072189.

27 Cal.App.4th 25 (1994)

32 Cal. Rptr.2d 371

WILLIAM H. LOVELADY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BRYSON ESCROW, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Six.

July 28, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Nordman, Cormany, Hair & Compton, Larry L. Hines, Kent M. Kellegrew and William E. Winfield for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Parker & Nelson, James Nelson, Lascher & Lascher, Wendy C. Lascher, Susan B. Lascher, England, Whitfield, Schroeder & Tredway, Mary E. Schroeder and Andrew S. Hughes for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

GILBERT, J.

Here we hold that security interests in real estate leases are not governed by the Commercial Code.1 Nevertheless, we also hold that a UCC-1 financing statement which specifically states that it covers a leasehold interest, may be sufficient to constitute a leasehold mortgage.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court entered pursuant to the defendants' motion for judgment on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases