The question of whether to permit the introduction of rebuttal evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, and the court's decision in that regard should not ordinarily be disturbed on appeal absent a clear abuse of discretion. "No such abuse of discretion infects the trial court's ruling in the instant matter, and we perceive no reason to substitute our discretion for that of the Trial Judge." (Saleh v Sears, Roebuck & Co.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WILMOT v. METHODIST HOSP.
202 A.D.2d 304 (1994)
609 N.Y.S.2d 768
Lawrence Wilmot et al., Appellants, v. Methodist Hospital et al., Respondents
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 17, 1994
March 17, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
