The IAS Court properly determined that the plaintiff's letter of January 31, 1991 constituted proper notice of a change of address to which all future notices had to be sent by the defendant. In view of plaintiff's unrebutted testimony of actual mailing and defendant's offer of only general office procedures, the presumption of receipt arising from mailing was properly applied (see, Engel v Lichterman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.