We agree with the IAS Court that plaintiff's cause of action in contract and for tortious interference with same alleges the same transactions and occurrences he set forth in both the prior mortgage foreclosure and matrimonial actions, and that he cannot now seek a different result on a different theory (Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v Nieberg Realty Corp., 250 N.Y. 304).
We have reviewed the parties' remaining contentions, including cross-appellant's request for sanctions...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.