PEOPLE v. MICKENS


202 A.D.2d 292 (1994)

609 N.Y.S.2d 184

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Fred Mickens, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

March 17, 1994


The defendant's contention that the eyewitness' identification testimony was incredible is without merit in light of the fact that the witness knew the defendant from the neighborhood for at least six or seven months prior to the incident (see, People v Butler, 150 A.D.2d 789, 790-791, lv denied 74 N.Y.2d 806). Moreover, there is no basis to disturb the hearing court's resolution of credibility issues (see, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases