U.S. v. MUMFORD

Nos. 93-2612, 93-2642 and 93-2768.

25 F.3d 461 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Brett MUMFORD, Robert Springfield, and Christopher Springfield, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided May 24, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher T. Van Wagner, Office of U.S. Atty., Madison, WI (argued) for U.S.

David L. Mandell (argued), Rick B. Meier, Mandell & Ginsberg, Madison, WI, for Brett Mumford.

James P. Brennan, Quarles & Brady, Milwaukee, WI (argued), for Robert Springfield.

Robert Glickman, Madison, WI (argued), for Christopher Springfield.

Before CUDAHY and COFFEY, Circuit Judges, and NORGLE, District Judge.


NORGLE, District Judge.

Brett Mumford, Robert Springfield, and Christopher Springfield each entered pleas of guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court imposed sizable prison terms and they now appeal from those sentences. We affirm.

I.

The three defendants were charged in a five-count indictment. Count I charged the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases