The IAS Court did not abuse its discretion in denying plaintiffs leave to amend their complaint — for the third time in the underlying action — to allege an additional cause of action for violation of the Human Rights Law (Executive Law § 296 [4]) based upon the defendant's alleged discrimination against the infant-plaintiff, Daniel, and in denying plaintiffs leave to increase the ad damnum clause from $23,675 to $4,776,156, so as to remove their pending...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.