Defendant's argument that he was deprived of a fair trial by the time limitations the court placed on the voir dire and its disallowance of certain specific questions posed thereat is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law, no objection thereto having been made, and we decline to reach it in the interest of justice. If we were to reach the merits of this claim, we would find that the court did not abuse its broad discretion to restrict the scope of voir dire...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
