OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DePIETRO

No. 94-2253.

71 Ohio St.3d 391 (1994)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DEPIETRO.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 30, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, and Alvin E. Mathews, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

Harry J. DePietro, pro se.


Per Curiam.

We concur in the findings and recommendation of the board. Accordingly, we hereby publicly reprimand Harry J. DePietro. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., A.W. SWEENEY, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur.

PFEIFER, J., dissents.

PFEIFER, J., dissenting. The facts as presented in this case do not merit disciplinary action. However, respondent did agree with the panel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases