1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 277 N.J.
  5. 277 N.J. Super. 175 (1994)
 

VAN NATTA MECH. CORP. v. DI STAULO

277 N.J. Super. 175 (1994)

649 A.2d 399

VAN NATTA MECHANICAL CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH DI STAULO, INDIVIDUALLY, AND DI STAULO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 3, 1994.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay R. Atkins argued the cause for appellant (Sunshine, Atkins, Minassian & Tafuri, attorneys; Mr. Atkins on the brief).

Sheppard A. Guryan argued the cause for respondents (Lasser, Hochman, Marcus, Guryan & Kuskin, attorneys; Mr. Guryan, of counsel and on the brief and Bruce H. Snyder, on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, DREIER and VILLANUEVA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by DREIER, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Van Natta Mechanical Corporation, appeals from the dismissal of its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. R. 4:6-2(e). Plaintiff also appeals from the denial of its motion to amend its complaint. Plaintiff's initial complaint alleged that defendants tortiously interfered with its contracts and prospective economic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases