JIMINEZ v. VALENZUELA


203 A.D.2d 249 (1994)

612 N.Y.S.2d 888

Victor Jiminez, Plaintiff, and Carlos Ramirez et al., Appellants, v. Eduardo Valenzuela et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 4, 1994


Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The appellants' sole contention on appeal is that the defendants' summary judgment motion was inadequate under Pagano v Kingsbury (182 A.D.2d 268) because the defendants did not submit sworn physicians' affidavits in support of their motion, while the appellants opposed the motion with affidavits of one of their...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases