STATE v. MOERMAN

1 CA-CR 93-0674, 1 CA-SA 93-0276.

182 Ariz. 255 (1994)

895 P.2d 1018

STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. David E. MOERMAN and James A. Diaz, Appellants. David E. MOERMAN and James A. Diaz, Petitioners, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Norman D. Hall, judge thereof, and the Phoenix Municipal Court, the Honorable Richard M. Smith, judge thereof, Respondent Judges, Kerry G. Wangberg, Phoenix City Prosecutor, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Review Denied May 23, 1995.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roderick G. McDougall, Phoenix City Atty. by Gregory L. Hanchett, Asst. City Prosecutor, Phoenix, for appellee/real party in interest.

Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, Phoenix, for appellee.

Richard D. Coffinger, Glendale, for appellants/petitioners.


OPINION

VOSS, Judge.

Upon stipulated facts, Defendants David E. Moerman and James A. Diaz were tried and convicted in Phoenix Municipal Court of misconduct involving weapons, a class one misdemeanor, in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes Annotated ("A.R.S.") section 13-3102(A)(1) (Supp. 1992). Each defendant was fined $100.00. Defendants' cases were consolidated and their convictions and sentences were affirmed on appeal to the superior court.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases