U.S. v. BRANDON

Nos. 92-1447 and 92-1465 to 92-1471.

17 F.3d 409 (1994)

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Peter BRANDON, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Charles D. GAUVIN, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Marvin GRANOFF, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald R. HAGOPIAN, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Momi A. KUMALAE, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Owen B. LANDMAN, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Norman D. REISCH, Defendant, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. John WARD, Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided January 31, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dana A. Curhan, by Appointment of the Court, for appellant Peter Brandon; John A. MacFadyen with whom Richard A. Gonnella, was on brief for appellant Charles D. Gauvin; Thomas J. May, with whom Carol A. Fitzsimmons and Johnson, Mee & May, were on brief for appellant Marvin Granoff; Barbara A.H. Smith for appellant Ronald R. Hagopian; William C. Dimitri, by Appointment of the Court, with whom Dimitri & Dimitri, was on brief for appellant Momi A. Kumalae; Donald P. Rothschild, by Appointment of the Court, with whom Tillinghast Collins & Graham, was on brief for appellant Owen B. Landman; Barbara A.H. Smith for appellant Norman D. Reisch; and Catherine C. Czar, by Appointment of the Court, for appellant John Ward.

Craig N. Moore, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Edwin J. Gale, United States Attorney, and Margaret E. Curran, Assistant United States Attorney, were on brief for appellee.

Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, CAMPBELL, Senior Circuit Judge, and BOUDIN, Circuit Judge.


TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.

The eight defendants in this case were convicted of conspiracy to commit bank fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and of a varying number of bank fraud counts under 18 U.S.C. § 1344 and § 2 following a jury trial in the district court. They now challenge their convictions and sentences on a wide variety of grounds. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm all of the convictions except for the bank fraud convictions on Counts 24 and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases