The court's charge with respect to identification testimony was legally correct and balanced and directly tracked the language of the Criminal Jury Instructions (1 CJI[NY] 10.20, part B). The prosecutor's comments on summation were a fair response to defense counsel's summation and within the permissible bounds of rhetorical comment (People v Galloway,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. SMITH
203 A.D.2d 204 (1994)
612 N.Y.S.2d 854
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Bernard Smith, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 28, 1994
April 28, 1994
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.